More Prison Guards Fighting Back in Court school yard crips

There are many that believe California's Prison Rehabilitation System and other systems around the world have more sinister purpose outside of incarceration. Discuss prison topics here in California, throughout the United States and Internationally.
Post Reply
User avatar
lb516
Middle Weight
Middle Weight
Posts: 340
Joined: November 1st, 2003, 6:00 pm
Location: 21st Brooklyn, New York

More Prison Guards Fighting Back in Court school yard crips

Unread post by lb516 » March 2nd, 2004, 5:21 pm

More Prison Guards Fighting Back in Court

Officers are suing inmates who assault them. Critics say it just creates more problem

By Richard Fausset, Times Staff Writer


For years, California's prison guards have been frustrated by a growing number of inmate assaults. Now they want their attackers to pay.

Fed up with a prison discipline system they find ineffectual, corrections officers are starting to sue inmates to collect personal damages. The idea is to target any assets the inmates hold outside of prison — or, in the case of poor inmates, whatever possessions they keep on the inside, such as TVs, hot plates and petty-cash "trust" accounts used to buy snacks.

"One has to remember that it's not about the money, it's about holding these convicted felons accountable for their actions," state corrections Lt. Charles Hughes wrote on the website of an employees group organizing the suits. "It may be small potatoes to you and me, but ask an inmate if he wants you to own his trust account."

As news of the strategy spreads around the state, prisoner advocates are deriding it as excessively cruel. Some attorneys say the suits could entangle the courts in a costly web of hearings, appeals and counterclaims.

"This is incredibly mean-spirited," said John Scott, a San Francisco attorney who represents inmates' families and prison employees in civil matters.

For the legal system, Scott added, "It's a Pandora's box."

The lawsuits come at a tumultuous time for California's prison system, and especially for its corrections officers. Their union, the California Correctional Peace Officers Assn., is under scrutiny for exerting excessive influence on the nation's largest penal system, and in January a federal report concluded that a systemwide "code of silence" existed to protect problem guards.

The union is taking no position on the new strategy, and Corrections Department spokesmen refused to comment on it.

To some critics, however, the idea of going after inmates' petty cash is another example of a system out of control. State Sen. Gloria Romero (D-Los Angeles), who chaired recent hearings on prison reform, wonders if the suits are part of a "publicity blitz" to offset bad press about prison guards.

Although acknowledging that prison guards have a tough job, Romero said filing civil suits against inmates "is a sledgehammer approach. I think there are other ways we can address the issue."

Hughes, an officer at the Lancaster state prison, is executive director of a recently formed employees group, the California Staff Assault Task Force. With a dues-paying roster of more than 2,900 prison workers, the organization already has helped four corrections officers file small-claims lawsuits against inmates in Los Angeles County and plans to file more across the state.

Another group, the California Correctional Crime Victims Coalition, is also planning to bring civil suits against inmates, according to its executive director, Lisa Northam.

Members of Hughes' group say the actions are necessary to restore a balance of power that has tilted toward inmates in recent years. With stricter limits on the use of force, some guards say they feel more vulnerable than 10 or 20 years ago.

Hughes said guards are also frustrated by a system that allows inmates to make frivolous complaints against the staff but often fails to mete out meaningful punishments to prisoners who step out of line.

"The department is failing to protect us," said Hughes, who added that the lawsuits fall well within the officers' rights. "If your neighbor came over and stuck a pitchfork in your gut, what would happen? The D.A. would file charges. But you'd also go after him civilly."

Prosecutors often decline to file charges against inmates who assault guards, considering such cases a waste of tax money, especially when the prisoners are already serving long sentences. Instead, many assault cases are taken up by the prisons' internal justice system. Inmates found guilty can face extended sentences, the loss of good-time credits and assignments to "special housing units" that limit their privileges.

But Task Force members say longer sentences mean nothing to a prisoner with multiple life terms. They also note that prisoners in the special housing units can still enjoy TV and radio, time in the exercise yard and visiting privileges. (The possession of TVs and radios in these areas may soon be banned under a proposed rule change.)

The group's recruiting material cites a dramatic increase in staff assaults in recent years. Total staff assaults rose from 337 in 1980 to 2,795 in 2002, the last year for which the department has figures.

However, the numbers of staff and inmates in the system have also risen. When measured against the prison population over the last two decades, the rate of assaults has fluctuated between one and two staff assaults per year for every 100 inmates.

Officers involved in those statistics say the effect on their lives can be devastating.

Corrections Officer Vincent Herrera, 41, was punched in the face Aug. 3 by inmate George Jacobs, after Herrera tried to enforce the dress code in a Lancaster state prison visitors' room.

The Los Angeles County district attorney's office declined to file assault charges against Jacobs, a member of the School Yard Crips gang who is serving a 30-year sentence for murder at the maximum-security lockup.

Although prison officials sentenced the inmate to more than two years in a special housing unit, Herrera doesn't think that is punishment enough. Herrera has not been back to work since the attack and is suffering from headaches and blackouts — one of which, he said, caused him to total his pickup truck.

Last month, Herrera sued Jacobs for $5,000, the maximum allowed in small-claims court.

"I'm scarred for life," Herrera said. "I want to make sure he never assaults another inmate, staff — anybody."

Jacobs was segregated after the attack in an administrative unit, where he allegedly punched another officer, Jason Frey, on Jan. 28.

Last month, Frey, 29, also sued Jacobs for $5,000. A third officer, Isaac Mijares, has also filed a suit against Jacobs over an alleged battery incident in August.

In the fourth case, Sgt. Stanley Kuhn filed a small-claims lawsuit against inmate Luis Gonzalez for an alleged attack in December. He is also seeking $5,000.

All the cases were filed with the help of R. Rex Parris, a Lancaster plaintiffs attorney. Hughes said other lawsuits on behalf of prison staffers in Salinas Valley State Prison, Tehachapi prison and the California Institute for Men in Chino are expected to follow.

The other prison workers group, the California Correctional Crime Victims Coalition, helped three Lancaster guards file a negligence suit against inmates who allegedly attacked them. The guards' attorney, Mark Peacock, declined to say why the suit was withdrawn in November, but one plaintiff, Sgt. Mark Ayala, said he planned to refile with the help of the new Task Force.

The two groups are not especially friendly — in fact, they are themselves embroiled in a lawsuit. The correctional crime victims' coalition filed suit in Los Angeles Superior Court last week, contending that Task Force leaders engaged in a "secret plan" to steal their membership rolls.

Hughes denied any wrongdoing.

"It you want to knKw Wh`t I tHink,the ur`osd nf pheYCrime Vi#tiMs' BoalitiKn\ ic 4o bue inia`eq — jov t@ey'R! 3einc boPs," `d s!i$&

Althnpghindi2idual oBf)CerS layhave cuad ih,atEs aj thD 0Asd, @risk. ehperPr sAy te new EfFor`s aArc Dhe firsD orc`niJed aptdmpt by gDards totajd adfantA&e of A !98" c@a
ge in statE law makinB ht !acieb for Pohiae and other pDaca ofbhcebs pn su@ pelle wHG `ttack tHem a4 wgrk*

efkre pOlh#e `n` otheb Croqps l/bbaed f'r phe A(ance, t(e Lonc-(eld Assamptionfas thatthe rhsj ofctbh ifjurids Tac uJdePstkm@ to bApa2$ of 0ublic r fe@y bl"s,said the@ ZEi$man, aN El CahOh pLaiFtIffs attnrney sho represdntC pnlIce inCivil sUits.
Since the changa,Zehdm@N has reppesenddd hunDrAdb mf pklhce ofbhcers if cucH lAssuits.

HUghAr, howevab, caid bivil AcpimN aGahnst iNiateS w@s r!re bdbauSe Ph`y are gandBa,ly coNsI@dbedtoo `o/r to su%&
Jow, Hqg(es' task fOrcD !ndthe bor2ectI.nal crime rictI,s coahHtio. said t`ey qmuld ure memb%rs' deesto bAnkrmll `awSuhts that would p$acH erR`nt priplneRs A hesson — no mattdr whaT amountof mkneY dheq h`re.

Aldhoeg( juddMenTs ara eppdct`d to besmall ih mkrt rUccer3fuL cas!s, critacs feAr thatthd CorrEbdioNs DApardmEjp will hlcur soee big eppensds b%"auce Lb the sthDs.The `epartlat )s `l"e``y groaningujderthE weHgHt jf Excds0ive l@p(gadion, and A rash of sma,` cIril dawsuitscoul req5ire ext2aescortS $orinmatesforced `o dabe coUrt datecand @esuld h
o&ficers taki.G mor$ tame o"f, r!adRichard SteffDj, sdaff directkr for 3t`de Se.* JacKie Rpeier D)HiLlSbjpouGh), gho iS hfl$in' (earings cn riln rEforh wi4h Rklerg.

The dEpartmenp he said( "is ` litIg!tikn macHi*e.Th`r juct `d`s more `o that legAl qrdeJ." 
ADtorney Scopt prediCtad nuMdrjus waYQ the suaps aoud@ buRdejhe coTrp sastam. He 3`id prisJN%rs mibht efjoQ their fhel$ trIps"to c-urt — `nd Phex vould definitEly fiht t. keep T(eir TVs and 4bust fun@p, The bh%rtC, he said, b/uld exPect coEp,)c!teD !ppEalr, aswell as stbpoenas That woeld reauire drag'alg doctkrc, Gabdens and de. mopd prisojd"s IndC court.

R#otT !lsJ nnted 0hatficdorio5s guar`p mIght have tg turn t``)r inNingsovar to t(eRtape Ib they ha$ fale` bor worKerr# c/m`ensatiN..

arriB, The attorbdy for P`e Tas+ Force,DispAted thaT. Ha alCo shrugced ibf critibirM D@At t(e hnmatds'actiknsW/ulD taa up the Courts&

the oint jf this aS That Phdre ara anmates rho cons0ire tn lurDergqarDs, he Said. "Do you rdAlly think wE care vh!t Kin@ of defanse pheY raiSe?"

Gr%tchen Newb), Exectdi6E dhrector ff dhe ijm`teaid#ro5p Frie.Ds Ou0side,afreEd th`t Cuard# sHoudD hafe a right t suE thdir atd`ckerC. But she hS wobrid` that th% saitS couDd harm `he inmaDes' )nnoceft faMilxle-Bers, She env(s)one@ situatiojs )n hhch an inmate'C bpousE h/ser the f!milQ #ar — kp childran lgse funda fkr cohl%ge.

"Bup we'bd deadind gith crIMinalc here a.D in mobt casec, dhe Don't 0end `o hafe degAtimade proe2tiEs, stoaK acckun4s ajd t@iNfs liJe phat," 3ha said. "CleArlq, this is n/t gni*g to be a moneYmaker

Post Reply

Return to “The Prison Industrial Complex”