Heres whats FALLACY. LUNACY. If I might add stupidity. Taking numbers like we did in our interracial debate of cross-racial marriages and DENYING DENYING DENYING.........like YOUVE DONE!
Over and over and over again. Not the census/marriage statistics/personal observations/births to interracial couples/deviations in interracial pairings ( for instance the 80% slant of black and white couplings and the 80% slant in asian and white couplings) HAS EVER EVER EVER made you even remotely aquiesce ANY POINT WHATSOEVER.
EVER. You my friend are a thickheaded baboon who doesnt/cant and wont ever see anything for what it is. You actually fail to even acknowledge differences in race. When in the last 10,000 years of human existence PEOPLE have over and over again reenforced genetic characteristics like fuller lips/body fat ratios/hair color.........and that SCIENCE ( not mayuga bitch) has proven over and over again that some racial characteristics are SO STRONG gentically that cross breeding MULTIPLE times over and over cant erase them!!
It can be erased. Thats how white and brown and yellow people came into existence. They changed from being black africans.
Talking about facts.
YOUR genetic code and mine too was once black african. Thats a fact.
We also covered the cross marriage also. Chicanos can blend in into most groups. There are also people who call themselves "Blaxicans". People prefer to stick to their own kind and to what they know.
Chicanos fit in with whites easily (because many chicanos are white-skinned), with any brown group and to some extend with blacks due to their social status of being underdogs aswell and living in the same areas in the US.
Of course all this increases the chance of chicanos to crossbreed, because they can fish everywhere.
If you were a black and from Congo you most probably have a hard time finding someone to marry in an all white racist environment, while as someone of latin descent who is just as white as everyone else (like you) you will have much less problems.
Thats just ONE subject. ONE. In this instance here-the argument should be simple. 37.5 million blacks outside Los Angelos. NONE who dressed inked drove and had gangs similiar to the ones in Los Angelos. What conclusion can we draw here?
That California has a distinct style. Why didnt have mexicans in Mexico that style? Because its not mexican style its US meets mexican style. US meets freed black slaves and impoverished workers from the south who move west in the beginning of the 20th century style. Its a mixture, a new mixture.
If it was distinctly mexican it would have come from Mexico. It didnt.
Now i would never deny that chicanos added their big share to all of it.
Now in reverse Chicanos from place to place had real similiar ink/lifestyles/culture and street art and banging from every which spot they were present. Texas-Arizona-Colorado-New Mexico-California-Nevada.
You are saying it. Chicanos. Not Mexicans in Mexico.
Which means descendents of mexicans who grew up in a new environment and soaked up new influences from their new environment.
If it would have been authentic mexican style with no US (which also means black influence), they wouldnt have used old english letters for tattooing, wouldnt have started to wear creased dickies etc. Also the cars used for the low riding culture are US made cars. Another big point.
Without the USA, no low riding culture. Point blank. Mind you, that i am not talking about a culturally specific US (white or black or whatever) i am making general points.
You also forget, that most blacks lived in the south for a very long time and they left it only lately (i mean historically lately, in the last 50-100 years), which means they just barely started developing distinct styles, slangs etc. and in the West they did too by borrowing from browns and whites and vice versa. No matter if you like it or not, people will always copy what they see and like. It doesnt have to do with race.
Every which one of these places had cholos/chicano type culture and chicano type gangs.
They all dressed similiar and wore similiar ink styles. Why deny that they and us in general havent developed an American of Mexican descent culture.
I mean can I take a brother from Atlanta and drop him off in Ethopia and say ...........by God he fits right in? Negative. Not in clothing/speech/style or even the food he drinks/the diseases he is suspectible to nor EVEN the BROTHAS GENTETIC CODE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You can also drop off a Chicano from Pico Union in Oaxaca and see how much he fits in there. Not at all. Compare these:
Go ahead and tell me the latter is uniquely mexican/chicano.
In addition, you made my point.
You see that blacks in different places have different styles without chicano influence. While in the US you think they must have the same styles otherwise its because they copied.
I wonder who the Ethiopians copied that they differ so much from most blacks in the US.
You see: Culture and Race are two totally different things. The first one exists, the second is a social construct.
And if i was you i would be very careful to talk about science, race and genetic codes.
Of course Ethiopian and African American Genecodes differ widely. African Americans have intermixed with whites, natives and latin people/mexicans
(Where Did Mexico's Blacks Go? http://www.isteve.com/2002_Where_Did_Me ... cks_Go.htm
and most black slaves came from western africa which set them apart from ethiopa who intermixed with middle eastern people mostly.
The variety of gene codes is biggest in africa, which means you could be genetically closer to an african then he is to another african from another part of the continent. (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30502963/ns ... p3e3psZe2Q
So the point you made is nonsense. Of course an African American is different to an Ethiopian in 18 different ways.
He intermixed culturally and genetically with whites and browns.
The only thing it reveals is, that you think he should be like him, if it werent for African-Americans copying chicanos. All africans would be the same otherwise.
If they werent, the african american would fit right in there with the ethiopians.